Yes on proposition 8

See this?



Now double it



Now imagine he raises children...

California Dreamin'

California dreaming and let us hope it won't be more than a dream.
As you know my blog (my 2-3 loyal reader) I love the speak of one different palce in the3 world at a time. What is the world if not our big happy poluted home?
As you guesed my friend USA California.


The hot news about Cali' is that Proposition 8 is on debate at the American supreme court. Prop 8 was voted at 2008 as a protector of traditional marriage. It banned same-sex marriage from California. Later the law found to be illegal according to the constitusion of the USA and at the very moment a debate is being held if to cancel prop 8. The might find same-sex marriage anti-constitutional and therfore ban thr banning all aroun the US. Or, in the best case scenario, cancel all same-sex marriage in the US.
Why am I so concerned about the gay-marriage in the US? Technically, I am not, for two reasons:
1) I am not American so I am not supposed to give any attention to their coltural habbits. However I am very fond of the American folklore and I hate to see traditions getting broken for modern rule-breaking agendas. It will make US a gay marriage sanctury to homosexuals from all around the world. They will hop to a short visit, get marry by the way and go back home to Greee or Russia or wherever they came from.
USA is one of the strongest countries in the world and acts as a role model to many other countries, if US reconizes same-sex marriage it  might influebce the smaller countries.
2) Another reason why I shouldn't be worried about US debate of same-sex marriage is: I am not opposed gay marriage (WHAT??). For itself the wedding is only a ceremony, traditional for most of us, and I am a man od tradition, but not all humans share the same tradition so not all wedding ceremonies should be the same. Marriage is more a law status and beurocratic, nothing serious if being homosexual or hetro sexual. Same-sex parenting are the problem, and I have allready spoken on it. We should let the child grow up and be educated by his biological parents, and if not (tragedies happens) we must defend his righ for mother and father. In some countries, Israel for example, their are certain laws of military serving duties during war-time: Women are beckoned to the army in emergencies, unless she is a mother. What should we do in case of two mother? no one is summoned? And two father? Both summened and the child is left alone?

It is not only the protection or sanctity of marriage, it is for the sake of children, American, and might be children of the world.
Say yes to prop 8

Not without Patrick

St. Patrick.
From latin: Patricus = Patre+Ricus= rich father
Also known as  Padraeg (Gaelish)

Patrick was not the first Christian in Ireland, but he is known as the man who converted Irelande to Christianity. Patrick claimed to be sent by god himself and not by a Christian authoroty, therefore was accused by the British church to be a frued and cheating the celtic clans for his own benefit. Patrick as a response published a document called the Confessio in which he described the British church the strugles against the old pagan celtic faith. Patrick arrived to Ireland in the age of 16 and was kidnapped by pirates. He was sold to a clan chief as a slave and for 6 years he was herding his sheeps and pigs whit thin clothes in snows and rain. The horrorble conditions and the lack of food made him stronger with his faith and he turned to a priest. For several nights he hears a voice calling him to ship back home and he fled  Durng his journy he sailed to Gull (France) there the crew found no food nor shelter. It is said the captain commanded Patrick to pray for is allmighty god for food.  Patrick told them they must leave their old gods and brace Jesus, so they did. A herd of wild boars appeared.
Patrick traveled between France and Italy and finaly went back home to England.
One day he dreamt of a man coming to him and handing him a scroll which titled as "Voice of the Irishmen". The people of Ireland begged him to return Ireland. Patrick saw that as an omen. He dicided to go back to Ireland, though he suffered ladt time, but not before he became a formal high priest. Patrick returned to Ireland as a bishop. He was attacked by a clanchief and his dogs. with a quick pray Patrick turned the man and the dogs to stone, and prayed for them to come back alive. The clanchief became Chritian and his whole clan with him. At the Bilteyn holyday (The Celtic spring holyday, not far from Easter) Patrick arrived to the king of Ireland. The head druid (a Celtic priest) was supposed to light a grand fire on the top of a mountain, instead, a grand fire was lit at next mountain by Patrick. Patrick and his priests were captured and taken to the king. He saw the way they were dressed and was riminded of a prophecy of his druids - the had told of Patrick arrivel. The king sentenced Patrick to death. Patrick made a speach of his religion and his god and turned many people to Christianity. Though the king himself did not approvw to the new religion he released Patrick and his men. He turned another king Chirtian and baptized him. He went through the island spreading the word of god. Lated a defeated the devil-bird Korra and cleansed Ireland from fiends. He died and were burried at Downpatrick.

The tri-leafed clover represents the holy triangle. Might also represnted ealier the tri-goddesse An.



Ireland became Chritiand more than 1000 years ago, yet some Irish folkes still be;ive in old spirits such fairies and Touta-De-Dannan/ Other don't belive but show respect to old traditions.



The druidic movement has returned to world several years ago. Some of the druids belive in the druidic religion, some atheist and Christians Conserving traditions of their ancestors.

Happy St. Patrick Day!

Hademus Papam!

Congratulation Argentina! Congrtulation Jorge Mario Bergolgio! (or shall I refer as 'his grace Franciscus I').
Known as the first south-American pope, but in fact is originally Italian, so if you thought about a native American, think again.
I love the Church for it trditios and its magnificene and Christianity for the the values ot promotes, but I do have some arguments with the vatican about Conservative issues.
The Catholic people might say i am not Conservative enough, but I say we Are conservative to different direction. Pope Franceso has opposed abortions, euthonesia and divorce.
As a Conservative the idea of an underage mother, 17 years old woman with a baby is unconcievable, even 18 and 19 are too young for my believes. Therefore I support abortions. No, I am not pro-choice, because it is not a matter of choice - Underaged pragnent women should be forced to abort. Think of the child. He will come to an incomplete couple, maybe he won't have a father and his mother would not finish her childhood and arrive adulthood on one leg.
Euthansia - dfor my opinion, death is a part of nature, a final step in our life, god's will, if you like. Keeping a man alive against the odds and against his choice is:

1. Spending money and recources usefull for feeding the poor.
2. Might cause him a lot of pain. Sometimes a person wants to die but we show him no mercy.
3. Against the nature. When a person suppose to die, he dies. Machines are only preventing a natural step. Addam and Eve did not eat the fruit of life, therefor should not use the machin of life

Divorce - I do believe a child have  to grow up with is biological parents. And the parents must do the effort to make this happen. (I'm not talking about unfotunate children who lost their parents.). Sometimes there are bad parents and sometimes there are parent that don't get along together. What shoul they do? We as a society can change the laws of marriage. Limit the numbers of time you can get married or get divorced, for example. Another option is a parenting license, if you proved yourself a worthy couple you are allowed to have a baby without paying a fine.

After disscusing the disagreements with the Catholic church, I will explain why I love them and Christianity in general. This religion started from Socialist idead of Christ and later the Catholic-Roman church gave us the seven virtues of the mortal:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_virtues

I do believe every humand requires those vitues, not only Catholic. It is difficault, I know, even the believers confess when they fail, but it worth trying.
Those vitues can help us become better people and even happier (think of the patience-Ira- virtue).


Goodluck Francis I
With love to all Catholic people in the world.

more about tradition

Regarded to yesterday:
TRADITION:

Well, it is not Japanese, but it does not matter. Tradition is good and important no matter who you are. Today we don't make our own clothes, milk our cows and most of don't study Torrah in Hebrew schools (and never have). Fotunatley, women joined to the labour long ago and they are integral part of the working class. It does not mean we should drop all of them. Traditions will always be a part of us, and some will lead us to a better future. Here I gave you a nice song (and great movie) from Fiddler On The Roof.

Tradition!
伝統!
מסורת!

Happilly ever after???

Today we will talk about Japan.
Why would I like to mention it? I have never been to Japan, but it will always sit on my travelist. Japan (like other countries in eastern Asia) is very secular and traditional at the same time.
I usually talk of tradition and, of course, Conservatism. The Asian country should be a role model for us, proving that Atheism\Agnostism and Conservatism can go together.
So what is tradition if not necessarily religious? Tradition is a memory for who we are and where we came from. Tradition remineds us that the present has a reason to be the present it is. For Jews, who were banned from their homes several times in history and therefore traveled, have more than the one Jewish tradition they share in common and one family may have the Jewish tradition but also tradition from the father's mother land and the mother's mother-land. In multi religious family (for example Jewish+Christain couple of parents) you can find traditions of both religions and traditions of both ethnic background of the parents. Tradition is beutifull most of the time, remines us of values long fogotten or makes us clos as a family. It can also be a wonderful experience for a foreigner, and makes him closer to us.
Some traditions are universal, developed in different places and yet keep simularity. It could be a result of natural causes - marriage, for example, monogamy excists all over the world (though some places still have polygami). Monogamy have been through hostories. In the bible we saw what happened in prophet Samuel's family. Monogamy drives humanity to the future.

Back to Japan. Japan is not somewhere in the middle of Conservatism and Liberalism, but it is actually found on both: They preserve old tradtions and invent new fashions to the world. Yesterday a wedding ceremony in the trditional country made a lot of fuss. Two women got merried in the middle of a Disney park. Outraged people, who complained about it, claimed that there is no problem between their odd love, but the wondered why in the public, middle of the public, middle of Disney park? well my friends, the problem is not the marriage, thought it is against tradition. The problem starts (or will start) when they begin to ask for child adoption. Yeah, I know the conservaphobes will burst with rage right-now and call me a homophobe, which I'm not. Single-sex couples claim for the right to have a family, they maybe right, but with about the child's right fot dad? (or mom in case of two men.). Now comes the question: Do you prefer bad hetro sexual parent than loving single-sex parents? No. I do not, but stealing is not better than murduring, it just less wrose. Murduring does not make stealing legitimate - Bad parenting does not make homosexual parenting legitimate. All those single-sex parenting who ignore a child's most elementar and natural right are just sellfish, and therefor I doubt they can really love as they claim.

http://www.japaneseweddingdress.biz/japanese-wedding-dress-the-most-beautiful/


Yesterday I was surfing on the web and learned new term: Hetronormalization. There were many other terms I did not understand in the Anarchist page, but I understood that one. Sorry friends, but history was built by hetro sexual couples. The hetro-Monogamy is common for all (most) of people and reflect the main goal of a human - raise family and be happy. When I say new world, I mean:  No differences between religions and nations and equality between sexes, but not simularity between the sexes. We are excist because of these diffrences. According to the Tau philosophy, they nature built by polars. one of those polars is the comleting polars (one half cannot excist with the other) the male & female.




伝統!!!


保守主義
社会主義
国の同胞

from google translate :)

Fun in Pakistan

We started in Israel moved to Venezuela and now Pakistan.
Last weak a man was arrested in Pakistan, you'll never guess why... no... no, not burglary... no, one last chance... you are absoloutly right - blasphemy of the prophet.

After the man was arrested the muslim citizens of Lahore were not content yet and started rioting at the Christians neighborhoods, burning houses and looting them. - Which is also a blasphemous behavior.
I usually condemn people making jokes of others belief, but making from religion laws is the worst.
The man did not only insulted the prophet, but was also drunk, another sin according to Islam - Alcohol.
In other places (COUGH- Theocratic Republic of Iran) the religious law is so harsh that there is no alcohol nor pork meat. I do respect the taboo of the muslims from pork & beer (allthough all the muslims I know drink beer when their wife does not there to watch) and I do believe in a sort govenment intervention in one's life, but it should be limited. They should intervene in economical and educational issues mostly, with some coltural and family issues and with everything that could harm others, but not one's diet or drinking habits.
I do believe Muslims can have peace with the rest of the world, even the Shiites. They don't have to give their traditions and habits away but they cannot force them on us. Insulting their prophet is annoying, that is true, however they can't attack anyone for it, they must look at things with proportion: You can't beat people because of religion. A spirtual matter VS Matereal matter. They are not even on the same scale.
In a Socialist state Muslims will be protected from the others, and everyone will be protected from Islamic extreme.
We will never be able to build a new world to live in if we continue fighting and showing no respect. The only war we need to fight is the war against Theocracy and Facsism. The Shiite Islam must drop is war against "Infidles". If we don't share your religions we can't be infidles, therefore pig and wine are not sins for us.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-21732448

DO NOT LET THE PAST INTERFERE WITH OUR FUTURE & DO NOT LET MODERNIZATION INTERFERE WITH YOUR TRADITIONS.

Three sides of the coin

I've just startes a blog, and every one passes away.
The Socialist oresident of Venezuela has passed away from cancer.
A controversial man, he was - A great Soicialist on one scale and an ally to the most radical right regimes of the middle east on the other. However, it is not the first time we that unnatural between the radical left side and the radical Islamic Theocrat right. How can this be? Castro and Kim Jung Il made contacs with mass murderer Assad and Fascist Theocrat Ahmedinajad. What makes to extremly polars get along so well? Why Communism, which opposes religion gets along with Theocracy? More than one correct answer is possible, my comrades.
One option is - world is not divided by the right or left, but it divided by freedom and tyrany - We saw it at the beginnig of WWII when radical right (Hitler) made alliance with radical left (Stalin). At the end of the world USSR and the free world joined forces, than maybe the free/tyrany argument is not true enought.

The problem continues when we try to divide the world to LEFT & RIGHT, now that's wrong, 'cause there are three different radical sides in that argument, and maybe even more. In order to understand the argument we need to get down to the root of the LEFT/RIGHT terminolgy.
I addad for the diffrences between right and left, not very important to understand, yet intresting.
What is right and what is left? The simplest way to explain is: Right - Sapratism. Left - Solidarity or unity.
When it comes to economy, the right will always try to be as much undipendent as possible: No one intevenes one's live, least taxes, no welfare. Nationality - right people are usually not the blood thirsy Fascist creatures we see in the media (these are the radical right), but they do want to seperate their nation from the others, some won't allowed magiage with others, some won't allow any immigrants. In some radical cases they even care about the nation or the state, they'll care more about the clan, tribe or religious sektor. In the Islamic Republic of /Iran they care more about the religion rather than nation or state. Hitler cared about the Aryan race and forbided breeding between races.
The Left. In economic issues the left will bw willing to share the national treasure: More taxes for more welfare. In radical left (Communism) there are only slight deffrences between salaries. The nation issues are less relevant. for the many of them there are no nations, or nations belong to the past. The radicals (Communist) will combine nation by force. Some people in the left will not care about nation or religion, but will be very zealot about the state itself.
Now we know diffrences, yet we have no idea why do radical right and radical left get along. One possible, and more reasonable is power. It is all about money and power and idealogy used to brainwash the simple man. another possible option is that there is one more polar:
Right and Left terminolgy has started in the 18th centuray in France. A representor if every class sat in councel that was supposed to make new laws or cancel old. There were poor working class (modereate left), sat on the left side of the table (physically) and rich Aristocrats (moderate right) sat on the right side, but there was another represntor, the Clergy represntor, (religion). The aristocrats and the clerics usually cooperated to fail the worinkg class. During the WWII we had the 3rd Reich (radical right), USSR (radical left) and the free countries led mostly by USA (moderate right). Today we have China (formerlty Communist, and yet Socailist and very secular) USA (still the strongest among the moderates) and the Islamic radical nations.

In the picture above we can see the true separation of ideals, while most of the people somewhere in the around the center: They care for their country, care for the society and care for their own freedom.
People such as Stalin ot Mao Tse Tung will be found in the red area on the left, no need to explain. Nazi people will be on the right side (separatism) of the suprrmacist.

As we can there are allways three sides two combined against the third:
Aristocrats and Clergy VS Proletarion
USSR & USA VS thirs Reich
Radical Socialist & Radical Islamic Theocrats VS USA (protecting the moderate Socialist).

Why did it happen and why did we lose such powerfull allies?
Ego, Money and power of the western leaders. In one word: mistakes.
Chinese people are forgeting what Stalin and Mao knew. Socialism is shield, shield against Fascism and, in our case, against Theocracy. Obama said today that he hopes the changes Venezuela help the relationtions between both states, we all hope so. And we hope the western leaders will smart enough to brace the red flag Socialism before the est will wear the green flag of Shareeya (Islamic code of laws).



Socialism, Conservatism & Worldwide Fellowship!

In the beginning

In the beginning...

Unfotunatley I have the start my blog, the Neo-Genesis in Ill-news. Rabbi Menachem Froman passed away last night.
Sadley and very shamefully I've heard his for the first time only yesterday, after his death. I heard of his deeds for the first time. So, why am I writing about him? At the very moment I am reading and watchin films about this fantastic man. Before I start talking of his connection to the the Neo-Genesis, I need to tell of his deeds: Make long story short - He was a man of both conservatism and peace, religioun and human rights, which usually illustrated as opposites. Although he was not pro-establishment of a Palestinian state, the rabbi made contacts the Palestitnian leadership in order to make a solution of peace in the west bank. Besides the west bank the great man worked to maintain peace in Israel, peace between secular and religious and peace between the tri-religiouns: Islam, Judaism and Christinaty.
This combination of peace & conservatism are two ideas the Neo-Genesis will discuss and supports. No matter what are your believes, as long as you love thy neighboor, want to raise you family in peace and conserve our environment to next generations, you  follow the Neo-Gensis ideals.
Why now? Well... I have been thinking of the neo-genesis a lot latley, I dreamed of a movement, but I am realistic: I don't have the money nor the support nor the experience to start a movment. So let's start with a blog. After the death of Rabbi Froman I saw many friends disscus about him. While learning about him I found a liberal friend who criticized him, I read the critic and realized: Liberal avoid criticizing Judaism or the church, they just criticize Conservatism, and one thing I'm about to stand for: Conservatism Don't get confused and mix with Capitalism, 'cause I believe in Conservative Socialsm, which I'll disscus in latest posts.

By the name of Socialsm, Don't give up tradition, and conserve you planet!